Quantcast
Channel: New York
Viewing all 2930 articles
Browse latest View live

New York Is Banning Tinder's Infamous 'Tiger Selfies'

$
0
0

Tinder TigerThe New York State Assembly passed legislation today to prevent people in New York from taking pictures with tigers.

"Hugging, patting, or otherwise touching" the big cats while at state fairs and traveling circuses is now prohibited in New York — and violating the law could cost you up to $500 in fines.

The trend of men posing with tigers for pictures for their Tinder or OKCupid profiles — tiger selfies, if you will — was brought to the public's attention in a Wall Street Journal article last month. The big cats are popular on dating sites, especially location-based Tinder, where "users estimate they encounter tigers in one out of every 10 profiles they view."

Manhattan Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal introduced the legislation because she saw the trend (immortalized on the Tumblr blog Tinder Guys With Tigers) as dangerous. She said the legislation was necessary, citing seven instances in 15 years New Yorkers were hurt by tigers.

So far, tigers are the only animal that New Yorkers won't legally be allowed to touch while taking a picture. "They can still pose with bears and monkeys," Rosenthal said, in regard to the men posing with tigers. "They just have to take big cats off their list."

Men seem to be the primary group of people taking tiger selfies. Women, on the other hand, are already sick of the trend.

The bill has yet to be signed by New York's Gov. Andrew Cuomo, but a spokesperson for Cuomo said it was under review, reports the New York Post.

SEE ALSO: Guys are posing with tigers on Tinder in hopes of attracting more women

Join the conversation about this story »


Charlie Rangel Rival Sounds Alarm Bells Over 'Voting Irregularities'

$
0
0

AP964009604856

Veteran Congressman Charlie Rangel's (D-NY) main primary foe wants everyone to be aware of the "widespread voting problems" that occurred in 2012, the last time the two faced off in an election.

State Senator Adriano Espaillat, who is hoping his second Rangel challenge will succeed Tuesday night when the polls close, blasted out an ominous memo to reporters earlier in the day that warns of voter discrimination.

"During the 2012 primary, the 13th District was plagued by voting irregularities that included: Insufficient numbers of Spanish-speaking poll workers; Last-minute reassignments of Spanish-speaking poll workers from Washington Heights to other areas; Prime voters in Washington Heights forced to use provisional paper ballots that were not immediately counted because their names were missing from enrolled voter lists; And incomplete election-night reporting, resulting from unreported results from heavily-Dominican poll sites," the memo reads. "With the widespread voting problems in 2012, we wanted to make sure you were aware of them in advance of today’s election."

Many of the Espaillat campaign's listed concerns are focused on the Hispanic voters and neighborhoods that make up the Dominican-American politician's base. Rangel's re-election path was complicated when his historically African-American district was redrawn in 2012 to become 55% Hispanic.

But Espaillat isn't the only one to raise concerns about the New York City Board of Elections, a much-maligned organization that many local politicos have accused of incompetence, partisanship, and worse. On Monday, a group of City Council members, some of whom have endorsed Espaillat, launched a preemptive call for the agency to avoid the "glaring inaccuracies" of the 2012 race.

"[V]oters were directed to incorrect poll sites, further discouraging them from casting their ballot. Additionally, the district saw glaring inaccuracies in the vote counting process as the Election Day totals differed enormously just days after, when every vote had finally been counted," the Council members said.

The BoE didn't respond to Business Insider's request for comment Monday, but the board's executive director, Michael Ryan, dismissed similar worries when speaking with Capital New York.

"We have 100% compliance," Ryan insisted Friday.

Join the conversation about this story »

Congressman Charlie Rangel Declares Victory After Heated Re-Election Battle

$
0
0

AP849304187657

Veteran Harlem Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) declared victory Tuesday night in his hard-fought Democratic primary and a likely 23rd term in Congress.

"We have fought this fight. We have won new friends. We have brought our community together," Rangel told cheering supporters at his election night party in East Harlem. 

Rangel was facing a rematch against State Sen. Adriano Espaillat, who came within about 1,000 votes of defeating Rangel in 2012. But despite shifting demographics and much of the Democratic establishment rallying behind Espaillat, Rangel managed to win about 47% of the vote to Espaillat's 44%, according to The Associated Press, with more than 99.5% of precincts reporting. (The AP has not yet called the race for Rangel.)

The race often featured bitter attacks between Rangel and Espaillat. In one of their debates, Rangel accused the Dominican-born Espaillat of running on his Latino heritage instead of substance, and Espaillat returned the favor by reminding voters of Rangel's 2010 ethics censure

In his victory speech, Rangel didn't seem especially inclined to praise Espaillat.

"I should congratulate Adriano for bringing the best he had to work with," Rangel said. 

For their part, Rangel's raucous crowd of supporters, partially filling a basement gymnasium, spent the night shouting their approval as Rangel's lead grew and grew. At one point, a small group of rappers performed the Rangel campaign's hip-hop song cheering Rangel's lengthy tenure in office.

"Congressman Rangel has stood the test of time," said New York City Public Advocate Tish James from the stage, "and he will remain the Lion of Lenox Avenue."

Join the conversation about this story »

New York Is About to Allow Medical Marijuana, But You Can’t Smoke It

$
0
0

smoking marijuana joint

In the next few days, Governor Andrew Cuomo is expected to sign a bill authorizing medical marijuana in New York State, making it appear green on colored maps of the US that track such legislation — though it probably shouldn’t.

The law, which was passed by the state legislature last Friday, is one of the nation’s most restrictive. It explicitly bans chronically-ill patients from smoking the drug, and it leaves many aspects up to a governor that took every opportunity to delay and water it down until recently, then took credit for it.

The bill’s most restrictive feature could be simply logistical: a sharp limit of 20 dispensaries in the entire state means there will be at most one every 2,700 square miles — a span that will likely be greater upstate — and only one per million New Yorkers.

“We view this as a step forward, but it’s not what we wanted, it’s not what our members wanted, it’s not what many of the patients around the state wanted,” Sean Barry, Executive Director of VOCAL-NY, an advocacy group for low income, HIV-positive New Yorkers, told VICE News.

One of those members is Wanda Hernandez, longtime Bronx resident and chairwoman of the VOCAL-NY board, who has lived with HIV since 1995. She has diligently taken her anti-retrovirals for two decades, never allowing the HIV to progress to AIDS.

However, even patients who keep their viral loads low are increasingly suffering from HIV-associated neuropathy, which can damage the nervous system, causing chronic pain and numbness. Hernandez began smoking marijuana several years ago to increase her appetite and alleviate pain and nausea.

“Medical marijuana helps me function and do the things I do as an advocate,” Hernandez told VICE News.

But she has had to rely on the discretion of a local dealer who delivers to her house, and if she wants to keep smoking, she will have to continue calling on his illegal services after the bill takes effect.

“I smoke three times a day,” she said. “It’s definitely in the back of your mind. You don’t want to feel criminalized for using something that is natural.”

Hernandez won’t even have a choice for the 18 months New York State has given itself to set up the program — which is longer than it took to construct the Empire State Building.

Earlier drafts of the law that included smoking enjoyed bipartisan support in the legislature, but Cuomo was adamant that the provision be excised. Cuomo also demanded the number of conditions eligible for medical marijuana be narrowed. Only ten “serious conditions” — including HIV/AIDS, ALS, and cancer — and a handful of broader, chronic symptoms are listed under the bill's doctor recommendation guidelines.

“The governor became very involved at the 11th hour,” said Barry. “There was already a compromise, and strong support in the Senate, but then he was sending signals that he wouldn’t sign the bill. It was almost like he needed to put his stamp on it.”

The administration has the power to expand the bill to include more medical conditions, but at a press conference held before the bill was passed, Cuomo appeared more concerned with showing that he could quash the law at any time than he was with implementing it.

“If there are unintended consequences, then we can suspend the program,” Cuomo said, describing the process as “you pull the plug out of the wall, the whole machine shuts down” — a particularly dark metaphor for killing a program aimed at helping the terminally ill.

A recent poll showed that 83 percent of New York voters support medical marijuana, with 51 percent in favor of decriminalizing personal use.

The bill allows patients to take their medicine via extracts, edible products, or by vaporization. New York Physicians for Compassionate Care, a group of doctors that support medical marijuana, sent a letter to the legislature in early June pointing to the large base of research that shows that smoking cannabis is safe and effective. Vaporizing can be expensive and, in some cases, might not provide the same palliative result as smoking.

“The cost of a vaporizing machine is going to create a barrier for poorer New Yorkers,” said Barry. Because cannabis is not approved by the FDA, insurers don’t cover costs.

Since the logic behind banning smoking was in part to prevent the spectacle of dispensaries with plants, it’s unclear if patients will even be allowed to vaporize whole plant material. Extracts and concentrates might have the paradoxical effect of increasing THC potency while eliminating therapeutically-relevant compounds.

“This is certainly an intrusion into the patient-doctor relationship,” Gabriel Sayegh, New York director of the Drug Policy Alliance, told VICE News. “It restricts the ability of doctors to make decisions based on their expertise.”

The law’s limits on who can recommend marijuana — only physicians and possibly certain nurse practitioners, at the state’s discretion and approval — has also raised concerns that patients in rural areas with a shortage of doctors could face an uphill battle getting treatment.

On Monday, Cuomo signed a bill expanding the availability of naloxone, an opioid-overdose antidote in increased demand due to an epidemic of heroin and prescription painkiller abuse. In New York, opioid painkillers like OxyContin can be prescribed by nurse practitioners and doctor’s assistants— the same professionals who haven’t been authorized to recommend marijuana.

Veterans returning from wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with PTSD and other chronic ailments have been particularly vulnerable to opiate addiction, and they would stand to gain much from the legal availability of alternative treatments like marijuana.

But the New York bill does not yet include PTSD — or muscular dystrophy and rheumatoid arthritis, for that matter — as approved conditions. A recent study has shown significant improvement among PTSD sufferers using medical marijuana.

It doesn’t augur well for decriminalization if, even after medical marijuana legislation, a veteran with PTSD can’t legally smoke pot.

New York’s bill is even more restrictive than neighboring New Jersey’s 2010 medical marijuana law, whose implementation has offered a stark illustration of how an unfriendly executive can throw a wrench into even the best-laid plans. Governor Chris Christie, who took office after the law was passed, has refused to authorize different elements like access to medical marijuana from out-of-state, a move that would expedite treatment of the severely ill.

Because of strict hurdles and formalities, the program has thus far enrolled fewer than 3,000 people, which Christie takes as evidence that there is little demand for medical marijuana.

“When we run a medically-based program, you don't see the demand,” he told a radio station last week. “This program and all these other programs, in my mind, are a front for legalization.”

New York’s bill is a reminder that, despite the headlines, drug reform is glacial in the US. Widely considered a progressive state, New York only rolled back its draconian Rockefeller drug laws in 2009. Even the bill’s spelling of the drug — marihuana— dates back to the days when cannabis was first introduced into the penal code in 1937, a time when it was still referred to as “Mexican weed.”

It’s hard to estimate how many New Yorkers could make use of the program, but they number in the tens of thousands. They are dwarfed, however, by the roughly 400,000 New York City residents who have been arrested over the past ten years for marijuana possession.

Join the conversation about this story »

New York's Richest Neighborhoods Are Terrible Tippers

$
0
0

taxi

A tony stretch of the Upper East Side is one of the wealthiest parts of the city — but you wouldn't know it from how residents tip food delivery workers.

Customers in the 10075 zip code — which runs from Fifth Avenue to the East River in the 70s and is one of the 10 richest zip codes in the country, according to Forbes — give food delivery workers just a 14.4 percent tip on average, lower than the tips in dozens of poorer zip codes across the five boroughs, according to data from GrubHub, the online food ordering site.

“They are the ones who are the richest, in the penthouses. They order [but] they don’t tip well,” said Umut Maya, 32, owner of A La Turka Mediterranean restaurant at Second Avenue and East 74th Street. “That’s why they’re rich.”

Brooklynites were the best tippers, offering 15 percent on average, followed by Queens and Staten Island, then Manhattan and the Bronx. Citywide, the average tip was 14.7 percent, but tips were as low as 9.8 percent in Jamaica and as high as 17.5 percent in Trump Place on the Upper West Side.

DNAinfo put together a map of GrubHub's data, showing how each neighborhood tipped from March 2013 to March 2014. (Note that the map does not include parts of the Rockaways, where GrubHub said they had insufficient data.)

In the Upper East Side's 10075, the third-richest zip code in the city, Faustino Hernandez, 48, who delivers for an artisanal pizza place, said tips are worse than they are farther uptown, where he used to deliver.

“In the elevator here, the delivery boys, we see each other and compare,” Hernandez said. “Two dollars, $1.50, $3 on a $50 order."

Maya, of A La Turka, said delivery tips are lower for online orders, compared to phone orders, and delivery workers suffer for it.

"Business is better — we are happy," Maya said. "But [delivery workers] need to be happy too."

GrubHub's online ordering platform does not give a suggested tip, allowing users to set their own.

Leslie Danzis, who lives on East 74th Street, said she usually tips 15 percent and was surprised to hear her neighbors give less.

"They have the money," she said. "They're ordering from expensive places."

Other top-tipping neighborhoods include Woodlawn, Flushing and Sunnyside, with average tips of about 16 percent, data show.

But the well-off 10024 zip code, in the West 80s, tipped at just the citywide average, and zip codes in the West 70s tipped even lower, according to the GrubHub data.

Nancy Burden, an elementary school teacher who lives on the Upper West Side, said she always tips 20 percent for online orders.

“If you don’t tip them, I don’t know how people think they’re going to live,” she said.

Minimum wage for delivery workers is $5.65 per hour.

New York City as a whole is the 13th-best tipping city nationally, GrubHub found, behind St. Louis, Missouri; Kalamazoo, Michigan and the country's top-tipping Boulder, Colorado, which averaged 16.2 percent.

The GrubHub data did not include information from Seamless, its subsidiary, which has a suggested 10 percent tip on its website.

GrubHub was recently investigated by state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who found that the company was taking a portion of workers' tips, Schneiderman's office said.

The company takes 15 to 20 percent of each order price, based on agreements with individual restaurants, but GrubHub was also taking a percentage of delivery tips as well, which "may have resulted in violations of New York labor law," Schneiderman found.

In an April 2014 settlement, GrubHub agreed to stop taking the tips by next April.

"GrubHub Inc. is committed to always acting with integrity and conducting business in an ethical and legal manner," the company said in a statement. "We have worked closely with the N.Y. state Attorney General's office to ensure that our policies and practices are in compliance with all applicable New York labor laws."

Here are the best tippers in the city:

1. 10069 - Upper West Side, 60s
2. 10470 - Woodlawn, Van Cortlandt Park
3. 11222 - Greenpoint
4. 11104 - Sunnyside
5. 11218 - Windsor Terrace, Kensington
6. 10312 - Arden Heights, Rossville, Annadale
7. 10307 - Tottenville
8. 11358 - Flushing
9. 11211 - Williamsburg
10. 10014 - West Village
11. 11215 - Park Slope, Gowanus
12. 11232 - Greenwood, Sunset Park
13. 10065 - Upper East Side
14. 11237 - Bushwick
15. 11105 - Astoria, Ditmars, Steinway
16. 10301 - Tompkinsville, New Brighton
17. 11238 - Clinton Hill, Prospect Heights
18. 11209 - Bay Ridge
19. 11201 - Downtown Brooklyn, Navy Yard, DUMBO, Brooklyn Heights, Cobble Hill
20. 10020 - Midtown, Seventh Avenue in the 50s

Here's how the boroughs ranked:
1. Brooklyn - 15 percent average tip
2. Queens - 14.9 percent average tip
3. Staten Island - 14.7 percent average tip
4. Manhattan - 14.5 percent average tip
5. Bronx - 13.9 percent average tip

SEE ALSO: The Strangest Items People Have Left In New York Taxi Cabs

Join the conversation about this story »

Two Billionaires Allegedly Ordered The Takeover Of A Russian Oil Company With AK-47s

$
0
0

siberia oil fieldNew York's top state court on Thursday reinstated Canadian oil company Norex Petroleum Ltd's $1 billion lawsuit claiming that two billionaires used armed soldiers and corrupted Russian court proceedings to gain control of a Siberian oilfield.

In a unanimous decision that reversed two lower courts, the Court of Appeals in Albany rejected claims by the billionaires, Leonard Blavatnik and Victor Vekselberg, and companies they control that the lawsuit against them was time-barred.

In 2011, Norex claimed that Blavatnik and Vekselberg, who live in New York, orchestrated a takeover of Russian oil company ZAO Yugraneft, in which Norex held a 60 percent stake, and an oilfield in Siberia it controlled worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

Norex said Yugraneft's offices in 2001 were overrun by militia members wielding AK-47 assault rifles. It also claimed the billionaires bribed officials in order to win a Russian court ruling that diluted Norex's stake in the company.

On Thursday, the Court of Appeals rejected the billionaires' claim that Norex was forum-shopping because it had lost court proceedings in Russia and a 2002 suit in New York federal court, which was dismissed on procedural grounds.

The court said a state law that extends the statute of limitations for lawsuits that are initially dismissed for procedural reasons applied to Norex. Since the prior federal lawsuit was timely, the court said, the subsequent claims made in state court were not time-barred.

Barry Ostrager, who represents Norex, said the company was "pleased to have its day in court."

Blavatnik said in a statement that the claims in the lawsuit were "preposterous" and that he would raise other potential grounds for dismissing the case.

A representative for White & Case, the firm that represents Blavatnik and the other defendants, declined to comment.

The case is Norex Petroleum Ltd v. Leonard Blavatnik, New York State Court of Appeals, No. 121.

(Reporting by Daniel Wiessner; Editing by Ted Botha)

Join the conversation about this story »

New York's Airports Are Finally Getting Free Wi-Fi

$
0
0

JFK_Terminal_1

Free Wi-Fi is coming to the New York City area's major airports.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey on Wednesday approved a plan to offer free access at Newark, Kennedy and LaGuardia airports, to a point.

Wi-Fi would be free for 30 minutes, then travelers would have to pay $7.95 for the day. The Port Authority says the free service could be available as early as this fall.

It currently costs travelers $4.95 an hour or $7.95 for 24 hours to access the Internet at the airports.

JetBlue already offers free Wi-Fi at terminal 5 at JFK.

The Global Gateway Alliance, an airport advocacy group, says the plan is similar to many used at airports around the country, though some airports do offer unlimited Wi-Fi.

SEE ALSO: The 20 Best Airlines In The World

Follow us! Business Insider Is On Instagram

Join the conversation about this story »

HOUSE OF THE DAY: Late Hedge Fund Tycoon's Historic Hamptons Compound Is Selling For $38.5 Million

$
0
0

Jack Nash HamptonsA Hamptons home that's belonged to the same family for more than 30 years has just gone on the market, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Dating back to 1904, this Water Mill mansion currently belongs to the Nash family. The late Jack Nash was the co-founder of the hedge fund and private-equity firm Odyssey Partners.

Nash passed in 2008, and his wife, Helen, has put the house on the market with Corcoran.

The home sits on Mecox Bay and includes amazing panoramic water views, gardens, and even a livable water tower.

This is the expansive, waterfront Hamptons property of the Nash family. It has been with the prominent family for more than 30 years.



The compound sits on six acres and 500 feet of water frontage on Mecox Bay. The property is said to have stunning Linden maple and dogwood trees.



The home itself is approximately 8,000-square-feet with 6 bedrooms and 8 bathrooms.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The Origin Story Of Manhattan's Internet Nerve Center

$
0
0

screenshot2

The Daily Mail has an excellent writeup on two old buildings in Manhattan — 60 Hudson Street and 32 Avenue of the Americas — that were built between 1928 and 1932 to bring telecommunications to New York City.

The buildings are an impressive, well-updated holdout from a time when long-distance calls needed to be connected manually by a human plugging and unplugging a wire. They've been continually updated and refined as central communication technology centers such that if you check your email in New York City, your data is almost certainly being routed through these buildings.

First built by Western Union and AT&T to facilitate telegraphy and telephone services, the buildings remain an integral part of how information moves through New York City, delivering digital data to some 8.3 million New Yorkers. They are locked down and protected accordingly, making use of biometric locks to make sure that the only people that get inside are actually supposed to be there.

screenshot4

Data center Telx calls 60 Hudson Street "home," and the company has since expanded to 32 Avenue of the Americas as of last year. The company's Blake Mitchell told The Daily Mail the two buildings "remain the central switchboards of our telecom culture; home to 400 carriers serving 600+ data networks — among the most richly connected buildings in the world."

The company commissioned an 8-minute documentary surrounding the history and architecture of these two surprisingly important buildings, which you can watch in its entirety below. It's filled with great tidbits on the history of communication as it pertains to the largest city in the United States. (Back in the day, phone operators used to have dormitories in the buildings!)

Join the conversation about this story »

Mysterious Rat-Eating Creature Finally Identified After Living In The Bronx For Months

$
0
0

Screen Shot 2014 06 27 at 2.18.53 PM

An odd creature spotted by Bronx residents numerous times over the past few months around the Morris Heights neighborhood has finally been identified.

The animal in question, which was first spotted in April by an NYPD officer, is a male fisher, a member of the weasel family that hunts rats and has never been reported in New York City before.

Fishers are known to live throughout upstate New York in the Adirondacks, Dr. Roland Kays of the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences told CBS New York, adding that the animal's apparent adaptation to an urban environment caused it to travel down the Hudson River and into the city.

"They're learning how to cross roads," he said. "They're learning how to survive right underneath our noses."

Although their taste for rats could be especially beneficial to numerous New York neighborhoods, Fishers are also known to eat small dogs and cats.

1024px Fisher,_Ipswich_RiverFishers lived on Manhattan when the island was first settled in the early 1600s, but quickly disappeared due to the fur trade.

Kays expects more fishers to make their way down to the five boroughs.

"The overall trend in the area is that their populations are increasing and that they're using more and more urbanized environments,"he told DNA Info. "We've never seen them survive in anything as developed as the Bronx, so we don't know. Can they really set up a population?"

Fishers are not known to carry any diseases, but beware: despite their cute appearance, they have attacked humans before, although this is rare.

SEE ALSO: These Photos Of Mysterious Ocean Creatures Are Creepily Beautiful

Join the conversation about this story »

A Woman Claims This Creepy 'Dexter' Ad Is The Reason She Broke Her Ankle

$
0
0

A New York City subway rider claims that a “Dexter” ad in Grand Central Terminal was so terrifying that it caused her to fall down a stairwell and break her right ankle.

Now, she’s suing.

Ajanaffy Njewadda filed a lawsuit with the Bronx Supreme Court saying the placement of the ad in Grand Central was hazardous, ABC News reports. 

To promote the final season of "Dexter," Showtime used a disturbing image of Michael C. Hall. In the photo, Hall is pulling plastic wrap, a tool Dexter uses to tie his victims down, tightly over his face. 

Dexter Grand Central

According to the Njewadda's filing, she was standing on the stairs with the 'Dexter' ad and turned around to look for her husband. When she turned back she was so shocked by Dexter's face that she lost her balance and fell. She broke her ankle and hit her head.

Njewadda's attorney, Rehan Nazrali, told The Daily Mail his client also had nightmares and could not go to that subway station for several months after the incident. 

Nazrali says the placement and use of this "shockvertisement" was reckless and is directly responsible for his client's injuries.  

"I think they should realize that they’re trying to elicit a psychological response from the viewer. They want something kinetic. There’s nothing wrong in doing that, but you don’t want to destroy people," he told The Daily Mail.  

Njewadda is suing Showtime, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the New York City Transit Authority, New York City, and CBS Outdoor Americas (the group contracted to place the ad in the subway).

SEE ALSO: Dov Charney's Ouster Won't Cause American Apparel To Ditch Its Sexist Advertising

Join the conversation about this story »

Vaping Weed Seems Healthier Than Smoking — But It Could Be More Addictive

$
0
0

Volcano Vaporizer Filling Up

New York state is set to legalize medical marijuana today, with Gov. Andrew Cuomo expected to sign a bill passed by the state's legislature last week. But the proposed law is unique, and smoking a joint even for medical reasons will remain illegal.

Under the law, doctors can prescribe marijuana compounds for people who have just a handful of life-threatening and serious conditions, such as cancer and epilepsy. The new law also bars smoking the marijuana flower, and instead limits people to either taking pills, consuming the plant's oils or extracts, or "vaporizing" the drug.

Experts say that vaporizing cannabis is probably healthier and less irritating to the lungs than smoking it, but this misty consumption method may also be more potent than smoking. And researchers know far less about the long-term effects of "vaping" the compounds in marijuana extracts or oils, compared with the effects of inhaling compounds directly from the plant, experts say. [Vaping: How E-cigs Work]

"We don't have the same safety data for extracts as we do for the flower," the part of the plant most often burned when smoking marijuana, said Mitch Earleywine, a psychologist at the University at Albany in New York, who studies marijuana use.

Vaping vs. smoking

It's not exactly news that smoking marijuana can harm the lungs. Burning marijuana produces hundreds of cancer-causing compounds.

"Aside from all the carcinogens in it, you're going to get soot in your lungs" from smoking marijuana, said Dr. John Malouff, a researcher at the University of New England in Australia, who has conducted research on the perceived benefits of vaporizing marijuana. "Because it's not filtered in any way," he said of smoking, "it's really harsh to everything it touches."

Vaporizers come in many forms, from the bulky plug-in tubes to the slim, battery-operated e-cigarette pens. Some heat marijuana flowers until a fine-mist vapor forms that contains cannabinoids, the compounds thought to be responsible for marijuana's calming and mind-altering effects. Most vape pens, however are used to heat the oils and extracts of marijuana, which are colloquially called "dabs."

Healthier lungs?

The law's restriction of marijuana consumption to vaping is sensible from a health perspective, Malouff said.

"If you're going to approve marijuana for medical use, why would you have people smoke? There's no medicine that people smoke," Malouff said.

Several studies suggest that vaporizing is better for health than smoked marijuana.

Malouff has found that chronic marijuana users cite reduced lung irritation, as well as improved taste and the absence of a lingering marijuana smell on their clothes and bodies, as key reasons for vaping rather than smoking the plant.

A 2004 study in the Journal of Cannabis Therapeutics found that vaporized marijuana contained little other than cannabinoids, and a 2007 study found users inhaled fewer toxic compounds and carbon monoxide when vaping compared with smoking marijuana.

And in 2010, Earleywine and his colleague Nicholas Van Dam found that marijuana users who complain of respiratory irritation reported a stark improvement in their symptoms just a month after switching to vaporized forms of marijuana. Those symptoms include asthma, shortness of breath and coughing up phlegm. The researchers also measured objective improvement in the participants' lung function.

More unknowns

But although vaporizing may sidestep respiratory problems, its physiological effects could be slightly different than those of smoked marijuana. That's especially true for vaporized extracts, which contain little other than cannabinoids such as THC, the main psychoactive compound in marijuana.

In Malouff's study, many users reported that vaporized marijuana felt more potent.

By not allowing the smoking of marijuana, lawmakers may have aimed to avoid undercutting the state's anti-smoking campaigns or to allow police to distinguish legal medical marijuana consumers from illegal pot growers, Earleywine said. But the law could have unintended consequences, as much less is known about the physiology of vaporizing dabs, he said.

In a forthcoming study in the journal Addictive Behaviors, Earleywine and his University at Albany colleague Mallory Loflin have found that compared to marijuana smokers, dab users may more rapidly develop tolerance to the active compounds, and may also have a greater risk of marijuana withdrawal.

Follow Tia Ghose on Twitter and Google+. Follow Live Science @livescience, Facebook& Google+. Original article on Live Science.

Copyright 2014 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

SEE ALSO: The First TV Ad For Marijuana Is Totally Bizarre

Join the conversation about this story »

This Adorable Weasel-Like Animal Is Reclaiming Territory In The US And Growing Larger

$
0
0

1024px Fisher face snow_ _West_Virginia_ _ForestWander

Earlier this month, a fisher was photographed in the Bronx, the first spotting of this weasel-like animal in New York City in modern times. This is in keeping with a general trend: After being exterminated from much of their native habitat throughout the Northeast, they are slowly spreading back into their old stomping grounds and have increased their geographic range more than two-fold in the last century, according to a study in Animal Conservation. The animals, "somewhere between a domesticated ferret and a wolverine" in size and attitude, are also getting bigger, the study noted.

"Finding that fishers are evolving a larger body size and that they're eating larger prey really shows that they're starting to move into the larger predator space," Roland Kays, a researcher at the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences and a professor at North Carolina State University, told National Geographic.

As Kays wrote of wrote of the Bronx fisher, in a post at the museum's blog:

Although they can be active during the day in wild areas, fishers living near people are nocturnal. This fisher was probably looking for a place to hide for the day, either down a hole or up a big tree. Judging from the picture this a male fisher, likely a dispersing animal looking for a female and a new place to settle down. If he can find a place to sleep and something to eat he might stick around. Bronx squirrels would make good fisher prey, but things could get really interesting if fishers start hunting rats in New York.

bronx_fisher

Interesting indeed. The animals are quite good at crawling through small holes, which makes them good ratters. It also helps them to hide in holes and/or sewers at night, and to move about through culverts and avoid "becoming roadkill," Kays wrote.

These animals are a type of mesopredator, or "middle predator," meaning they prey on middle-sized and smaller animals — and males can grow up to four feet long and weigh 13 pounds. Their spread is a type of "mesopredator release," which happens due to a reduction in the number of apex, or top-level, predators like wolves, the study authors wrote. (In other words, the absence of top-level predators has allowed fishers to be "released" from this predation pressure.)

SEE ALSO: The Smartest Animals In The World

Join the conversation about this story »

How To Protect Yourself From NYC Real Estate's 'Kickback Economy'

$
0
0

cash hand bribe kickback

You're all set to renovate your apartment. You've lined up a contractor and picked the fixtures you want. You've saved $100,000, which should even cover emergencies.

But what you may not know is that hundreds or thousands of dollars of your budget may be going straight to your super, just to make sure the job goes smoothly (and maybe bend a building rule or two). 

Graft, payola, quid pro quo: whatever you call it, money passes under the table all the time in New York. Often it's comparable to a tip, a way to say thanks to people who help out; sometimes it slides into illegal territory. 

Either way, these informal payments may not be in your best interest. If someone refers you to real estate professionals or other businesses with the goal of getting paid, you can’t be sure you’ll get the best person for the job, or pay the right price.  And anyone relying solely on shady referral fees to get business is likely not at the top of their game.

“From the consumer standpoint, when somebody’s paying a kickback, you can be virtually assured you’re not getting the best service and the best protection,” says Daniel Price, CEO of OneTitle National Guaranty Company, who founded the title insurance firm with a focus on ethics, in part because he saw a troubling level of fraud in the title insurance industry. 

So what kickbacks should you be looking out for? We spoke to about 10 real estate brokers, building staff and other industry professionals to find out how you can protect yourself. 

THE GOOD (okay, not good, but more like forgivable)  

One of the most common examples of money changing hands are tips from contractors to building staff like supers, doormen, elevator porters and handymen.

A contractor may throw a super some cash simply to get a referral, sources say. If you're renovating your apartment be aware that the recommendation you received may have involved a cut of the action (more on that below). Nonetheless, you probably won't get a complete dud, even if the person isn't the cheapest or the most-qualified for the job. It’s unlikely a super will recommend someone solely based on a payoff. But it's best to get several bids instead.

“The one thing [supers] want generally more than anything is for their lives to be easy,” says one New York City residential construction consultant. “They learn quickly that if they take a kickback from a contractor that’s not a particularly good contractor, it’s not worth it.”

More commonly, building staff will get cash and gifts from contractors and construction workers—a few hundred to a few thousand dollars, depending on the scope of the job—for any extra work they take on during a renovation.

It’s so common that contractors factor it into the cost of the job—often part of the “general conditions” category on the bid, covering miscellaneous expenses, says the construction consultant. (The practice is especially common in tony co-op buildings, such as on the Upper East Side, because it's so tough to navigate the scores of restrictions, sources say.)

Supers usually get the biggest share of tips—anywhere from $200 to $400, says one building staffer—since they have the power to shut down an entire job, at least temporarily. But sometimes a contractor will slip the doorman $50 or pay for lunch, says one Upper East Side doorman.

“During the holidays, it would be very typical that you would go to a building and every person that helped you on your job would receive a Christmas present,” the consultant says. “You are kind of a pain in the ass to the building.” 

For staffers, construction means more calls from peeved residents, more dust to clean up, more annoying jobs like shutting off the water in a line of apartments—so there’s a reason why you’d want your contractor to get on their good side. And if you’re already shelling out thousands for the reno, it may not be the worst investment to drop a few hundred bucks on the men and women who work in your building.

*

When it comes to movers, some pay referral fees, though for the most part, they seem to be more formal—a company referral program versus a fistful of cash at the door.

For example, FlatRate Moving has a website where industry pros—the majority of whom are brokers—can sign up and submit referrals in exchange for a percentage of the cost of the move, says Ryan Benz, the company's business development manager. Fees vary based on the type of job, such as whether the move is local, cross-country or international.

Benz says this is "industry standard practice" and doesn't affect pricing for customers, who pay the same rate whether a referral fee is involved or not. In some cases, "the referrer gives [the fee] back to the client to apply to his or her overall move, which is a common, customer relationship-building practice," Benz says. Brokers can also use the website to donate the fee to a charity, which Benz estimates happens about 10 percent of the time.

Bottom line: this practice could benefit the average New Yorker, and brokers aren't breaking the law if they take the fees. But if you have any reason to think your broker is recommending a mover out of greed, rather than customer feedback or personal experience, you may want to go elsewhere.

*

Brokers sometimes refer business—i.e. you—to other brokers if they’re not the right person for the job, say if they mostly work with Upper East Side sellers but know someone looking for a rental in Bushwick. It’s perfectly legal (though it may affect your broker's willingness to negotiate their fee).

The standard referral fee is 20 to 25 percent of the commission on a sale and 10 percent of a broker’s fee on a rental, says Jason Haber, a broker at Warburg Realty, with the cost coming out of the paycheck of the broker who makes the deal.    

Property managers also get in on the referral game. Since they must be licensed as brokers to collect rent on behalf of landlords, they're legally allowed to collect this. If they know a tenant is moving, they may tip off a broker and collect 10 to 20 percent of the fee in return, says one source.

Naturally, whether you take a broker's recommendation will depend on your relationship and level of trust. 

Keep reading at BrickUnderground >>

Join the conversation about this story »

A Tiny, 100-Pound Woman Could Dominate Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest

$
0
0

nathan's hot dog eating contest

American world-record holders and pretenders to the crown of hot-dog chomper of the year weighed in for the hugely popular annual July 4 Coney Island competition set to draw thousands.

Seventeen men and 13 women are competing to see how many beef franks they can down in 10 minutes at Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest at the cheesy Brooklyn seaside resort on Friday.

Come rain or shine -- and thunderstorms are predicted overnight -- organizers insist the contest will be held outdoors and watched by millions more when it broadcasts live on ESPN2.

Sonya "Black Widow" Thomas, 46, the reigning champion who chomped down 45 dogs in 2012 and 36.75 last year, faces a major threat from would-be usurper Miki Sudo, 28.

"I faced Sonya 10 times over the last year and a half, and beat her every single time," Las Vegas's Sudo told a New York press conference on Thursday.

"I hope to win, and (to) set a new record would be great!"

Thomas, a skinny Korean-American who weighs 100 pounds (45 kilos), doesn't just have one world record, she has 23.

She is the champion of baked beans (8.42 pounds in two minutes 47 seconds); cheesecake (11 pounds in nine minutes); lobster (44 in 12 minutes) and oysters (564 in eight minutes), according to Major League Eating

But her favorite food? Hard-boiled eggs. She can eat 92 in eight minutes.

On the men's side, California's Joey "Jaws" Chestnut, 30, has been reigning champion for seven consecutive years.

Last year he beat his own record by eating 69 dogs, but he faces stiff competition from the much smaller Matt Stonie.

"I know I can beat him," said Stonie.

If that's the case, Chestnut can console himself with his other 31 world records, including in ice cream (15 pints of vanilla in six minutes); bratwurst sausages (70 in 10 minutes); and hard-boiled eggs (141 in eight minutes).

To get the dogs down, each contestant has certain tricks, but most soak the bread in water and eat the meat separately.

Anyone who vomits is disqualified.

Nathan's Famous Hot Dogs says the Independence Day contest has been running since 1916 -- when the winner consumed 13 hot dogs.

SEE ALSO: What Are Hot Dogs Really Made Of?

Join the conversation about this story »


The Method To Chuck Schumer's Media 'Madness'

$
0
0

AP110731019359

Veteran Democratic New York Senator Chuck Schumer has earned a reputation as a lawmaker who loves seeing his name in the headlines and, especially, his face on television. An infamous joke on Capitol Hill claims "the most dangerous place in Washington is between Chuck Schumer and a TV camera." President Barack Obama once tweaked Schumer at an event by joking the senator had brought his "loved ones" — "the folks with the cameras and the notebooks in the back of the room." 

However, in a half-dozen interviews with Business Insider, former Schumer staffers articulated a far more nuanced media strategy and shared some lessons from the Chuck Schumer School of Public Relations. Two former aides to the senator independently declared there is "a method" to the senator's "madness."

"He’s very successful and smart when it comes to identifying issues where the press can play a key role in solving a problem. I think one of the misnomers ... is that it's just about getting press for the sake of getting press. But there’s a method to the madness," said Phil Singer, who served as Schumer's communications director both in his senate office and at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

Weekly Sunday press briefings are a staple of Schumer's strategy for getting ink and airtime. Schumer is credited with inventing these Sunday morning press conferences, which have since been occasionally adopted by other New York lawmakers. At these events, Schumer often stands before a gaggle of reporters and announces his plan to fix some obscure problem that wasn't necessarily on anyone else's radar.

"The incidents are skyrocketing," Schumer said at one such event in 2012, holding a colorful laundry detergent gel pod. "These pods were supposed to make household chores easier, not tempt our children to swallow harmful chemicals. I saw one on my staffer's desk and I wanted to eat it ... I don’t know why they make them look so delicious."

In addition to fighting the menace of potentially appetizing laundry detergent pods, Schumer has waged war on metal barbecue brushes. He's urged tougher rules for laser pointers. The senator helped to banish caffeinated alcoholic beverages after the Four Loko brand rose in popularity. Powdered alcohol. Inhalable caffeine. The list goes on. The New York Observer once teased Schumer's propensity for taking on these rather esoteric causes with  a slideshow titled, "A List of 'Fun' Things Sen. Charles Schumer Has Tried to Destroy."

To generate maximum attention for his efforts, Schumer's press conferences regularly latch onto larger media narratives. For example, after the missing Malaysian plane dominated the news earlier this year, he called for new travel rules. At the height of World Cup fever last month, Schumer was there calling for a health alert about a mosquito-born virus soccer fans could possibly bring back to the United States from the games in Brazil.

It's easy to be dismissive of Schumer's apparent hunger for headlines and his eccentric roster of pet projects. Indeed, the senator's political opponents mock his propensity for courting media attention. 

"New Yorkers have little to show for having America’s hammiest Senator: if Chuck Schumer thought half as much about jobs as he does about mosquito bites and bath salts, we might not have more Americans out of the labor force than at any time in our Nation's history," David Laska, a spokesman for the state's Republican Party, told Business Insider.

But Schumer's allies argue the various issues he's taken on over the years often truly matter to ordinary New Yorkers.AP101110032170"Whether in fact the suntan lotion that you're putting on your kids is actually protecting them or not, that's a real issue," said Mike Morey, a former Schumer press secretary, referencing another one of the senator's crusades. "My wife and I, we look at the bottle, we try and make sure that the stuff we put on our kids is good for them and will protect them."

Stu Loeser, another former Schumer press secretary, recalled telling the senator of his mother's discovery one of her gift cards had lost value over time. Schumer was indignant and made the issue one of his trademark initiatives.  

"Chuck said, 'Do they all do this? Do all gift cards have this depreciating value once you activate them?' And he said, 'Look into it,'" Loeser recounted, describing Schumer as "outraged" after learning the practice was widespread. "The Sunday after Thanksgiving, right after the shopping season, we launched a press conference."

Loeser said the senator's action helped lead gift card companies to voluntarily curb the practice.

"Is it TARP? Is it the Mexican monetary crisis of 1994? No it’s not like that. But does it matter to real people? Absolutely. It matters to a lot of people," Loeser continued.

Along with his more personal battles, Schumer, who is widely considered a leading candidate to eventually replace Majority Leader Harry Reid, has spearheaded more conventional fights in Washington to advance his party's priorities on bread-and-butter issues like a minimum wage increase and tuition relief. Schumer is currently championing the "fair shot" agenda that contains many of these ideas. Still, whether he's railing against barbecue brushes or national economic issues, staffers say Schumer's media strategy follows a similar script.

The Schumer media method, according to yet another one of the senator's former senior aides, is relatively simple.

"You can always tell that a former Schumer staffer ... has written something because it always follows a certain formula: Present the problem. Personalize the problem. Present the solution. Personalize the solution," the aide said. "Something is bad. Something is wrong. Something needs fixing. Here’s why. When Mary Smith needs to do X or tries to do Y, she can't do it because of what I just told you. I believe that this problem can be fixed the following way. Now Mary’s able to do it."

Indeed, Schumer's formula appears to have had at least some success. According to the Daily News, 57% of Schumer's Sunday morning events in 2013 were followed by federal action on the issue. (The Schumer camp believes the paper's methodology was flawed and that number should be even higher.)

In a statement to Business Insider, Schumer touted some of what he has accomplished through media exposure.

"Working with the media remains an effective and essential way to raise issues, educate the public, and prod policy-makers and corporate leaders to change for the better," he said, citing Sandy relief aid, reforming the gift card system, and a New York City welcome-home parade for veterans of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. "Work we have done to raise issues via media exposure has been fundamental to producing positive results that have real impacts on New Yorkers' lives." 

Join the conversation about this story »

Uber Cuts The Price Of An UberX By 20% In New York City, Making It Cheaper Than A Taxi

$
0
0

Travis Kalanick Uber Cover Illustration_03

Now we know why car-hailing app Uber raised a whopping $1.2 billion in funding: It's starting a price war with its rivals.

Uber announced in a blog post on Monday it would cut the prices of its UberX service in New York City by 20% — but it’s only for a limited time. 

Uber says this makes it cheaper to use UberX than taking a traditional yellow taxi.

It provided a comparison chart to show how much cheaper UberX will be for drivers commuting to various parts of New York City.

uber nyc price cuts

UberX, Uber’s cheaper service usually hosted by regular people driving basic sedans rather than fancy black cars, also cut its rates by 25% last week in the Bay Area, including San Francisco, San Jose, and Oakland. As a result of that announcement, Uber said its service was effectively “45% cheaper than a taxi.”

Consumers like Uber’s aggressive pricing strategy but competitors — and some of its own drivers — are not as happy. Uber drivers have complained about price cuts, arguing they actually work for less than minimum wage (the company argues otherwise, stating drivers can be paid anywhere between $75,000 and $90,000). They’ve also said Uber’s rating system is inherently flawed and unfair, since drivers that receive bad ratings from their passengers — with any reason, or none at all — can get booted from the service without warning.

There have been protests of Uber in San Francisco, London, and Milan. 

Even though the price cuts are temporary, one wonders what would happen if Uber tried price cuts again in the future since the drivers are the ones that suffer from lower costs. It’s an interesting model, but its sustainability remains a big question mark for the disruptive car service. 

Join the conversation about this story »

Team Cuomo Fires Back Against 'Pathetic' Claim He Misused Storm Relief Aid

$
0
0

AP120974812597

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo returned fire after his Republican rival released an incendiary video Monday morning accusing him of essentially embezzling Hurricane Sandy relief money for political purposes.

"Is it true that you diverted Hurricane Sandy and other relief money into TV commercials to help your re-election?" the GOP challenger, Rob Astorino, asks in the video.

In the clip, Astorino doesn't detail his sourcing or evidence for the claim. Astorino merely said he was "told the allegation is true. When Business Insider contacted his campaign to ask for proof of the allegation they pointed to the reported $40 million in federal funds that New York State sought to promote tourism and business in areas hard-hit by the 2012 storm.

The New York Times reported in 2013 that Cuomo critics claimed these sorts of ads were "a backdoor way of elevating the governor’s stature, even though they do not mention his name and he is prohibited from appearing in them." Republican New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie faced far more scrutiny, including a reported federal investigation, after he personally appeared in Sandy recovery ads during his re-election campaign.

Reached for comment on the Astorino allegations, Cuomo's government office referred Business Insider to his campaign operation, which disputed the idea the governor had diverted money from victims and slammed Astorino's "pathetic, baseless attacks."

"This is yet another in a string of pathetic, baseless attacks by a flailing candidate," campaign spokesman Peter Kauffmann said in a statement. "The federal government approved funds for advertising to promote tourism in counties devastated by storm damage. New York State invested in a series of tourism ads to drive vacation dollars to those counties, many of which featured small businesses in the impacted areas. Under Governor Cuomo's leadership, New York is building back better than ever."

Kauffmann said Cuomo's position sharply contrasts with the Astorino "strategy."

"I guess Rob Astorino's strategy would have been to tell those counties to drop dead," he quipped.

Join the conversation about this story »

The 10 Best Sushi Restaurants In New York City

$
0
0

sushiWith a Japanese restaurant on practically every street of New York City, it can be hard to navigate between the cheap all-you-can-eat spots and the overpriced yet still sub-par restaurants. 

To help you out, we put together a list of the best sushi restaurants in New York City.

To create this, we combined five notable rankings from food experts and New York publications, including Zagat, the Village Voice, Eater, Time Out New York, and GothamistWe gave each restaurant a numerical ranking based on how many lists it appeared on and how high it appeared on the ranked lists. We only included restaurants that made at least two lists. 

No. 10 Soto

357 6th Avenue

Sea urchin, or "uni," is a delicacy and Soto Japanese does it best. Chef Sotohiro Kosugi proves that the spiky creatures are not just edible, but downright delicious. The two-starred Michelin spot is pricey, so make it worth your while and be adventurous with the wide range of fresh fish. 

 



No. 9 Ushiwakamaru

136 W Houston Street

Located in the West Village, Ushiwakamaru stands out for its very fresh, raw fish selection that's carefully crafted by chef Hideo Kuribara. The restaurant itself is pretty simple and lets the food speak for itself. 



No. 8 15 East

15 E 15th Street

Another Michelin star recipient, 15 East dishes out impressively fresh, seasonal sushi from a chef who really knows his stuff. Masato Shimizu left Jewel Bako to stand behind this restaurant's sushi bar, where he educates diners with charts and books about the fish they're eating. Dine a la carte or try the omakase.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Uber Rival Lyft Is Launching In New York

$
0
0

lyft

Lyft, the fist-bumping and pink-mustachioed ride-sharing startup, is launching in Brooklyn and Queens this Friday.

This is Lyft's biggest launch to date, with over 500 drivers already on board. That figure is about 10 times Lyft's founding drivers community in other cities. 

To be clear, if you hop in a Lyft car in Brooklyn, you'll be able to go within Brooklyn, to Queens, and even to Manhattan. The only rule is that the ride has to start within Brooklyn or Queens. So, you won't be able to hail a Lyft car in Manhattan and take it back to Brooklyn.

Although Lyft's model isn't covered by any existing city or state law, the startup says it's working with the Taxi Limousine Commission to discuss Lyft's safety measures.

"We have voluntarily engaged with TLC to explain how our peer-to-peer model works and the measures we take for safety," a Lyft spokesperson told Business Insider via email. "This is a continued conversation that started when Lyft's VP of Government Relations appeared on a NYU panel with TLC Commissioner Meera Joshi."

Regulatory issues continue to plague startups like Lyft, Uber, and Airbnb. Just last month, one of the top public university system's in the world announced that it's considering banning its employees from using those services. Meanwhile, the New York Attorney General is investigating the legality of Uber's surge pricing.

Lyft is now live in more than 60 cities across the country. Back in April, Lyft raised a $250 million round of funding backed by Alibaba. To date, Lyft has raised $332.5 million.

SEE ALSO: Uber’s Regulatory Issues Could Be A Godsend For Rival App Hailo

Join the conversation about this story »

Viewing all 2930 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>